Eduardo Felix v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20251:20-cv-01774California6,266 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDUARDO FELIX, Case No. 1:20-cv-1774 JLT BAM

Plaintiff, ORDER DECLINING THE FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S APPEAL, DENYING

DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO AFFIRM,

v. AND REMANDING THE ACTION FOR

FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO

FRANK BISIGNANO, SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) Commissioner of Social Security1, ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF Defendant. JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF EDUARDO FELIX AND AGAINST

DEFENDANT FRANK BISIGNANO,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

(Docs. 18, 21, & 23) Eduardo Felix seeks judicial review of a final decision denying his application benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. (Docs. 1, 18.) Plaintiff asserts the administrative law judge erred in evaluating the record, and the Appeals Council erred by failing to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.