(PC)Allen

James D. Allen v. Arias, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20251:22-cv-01502California7,204 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES D. ALLEN, Case No. 1:22-cv-01502-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR

v. FAILURE TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE

REMEDIES

ARIAS, et al., (ECF No. 60) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff James D. Allen (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s third amended complaint against: (1) Defendant M. Rodriguez for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; (2) Defendant M. Rodriguez for assault and battery under state law; and (3) Defendant J. Anaya for failure to protect/intervene in violation of the Eighth Amendment. All parties have consented to United States Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 59.) On February 6, 2025, Defendants J. Anaya and M. Rodriguez filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.