Walsh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Mark Walsh, No. 1:23-cv-01774-KJM-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER v. Bob Martin, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, an employee of the San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority (the Authority), 18 brings claims against defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. Defendants are plaintiff's supervisors and the Authority; they move for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the court grants defendants’ motion. I. EVIDENTIARY RECORD The court has compared the parties’ respective statements of fact and the underlying 23 record and reviewed the relevant deposition transcripts. See Defs.’ Statement of Undisputed 24 Facts (Defs.” SUF); ECF No. 32-2; Pls.’ Opp’n to Defs.’ Statement of Undisputed Facts (Opp’n SUF), ECF No. 27-1; Notice of Lodging, ECF No. 27-4. The court addresses evidentiary 26 objections only to the extent…