Locatelli

Eric Curtis Lund v. Izen Locatelli, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20252:21-cv-01831California1,925 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC CURTIS LUND, No. 2:21-cv-01831-DJC-SCR 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 IZEN LOCATELLI, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 Petitioner, proceeding through counsel, filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Presently pending is Respondents’ partial Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Petition. (ECF No. 39.) On March 20, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Petitioner filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations as well as a Request for Judicial Notice. (ECF Nos. 47–48.) Respondents submitted a Response to Petitioner’s Objections and an Opposition to the Request for Judicial Notice. (ECF Nos. 50,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.