Spencer

Jean-Max Darbouze v. Spencer, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20252:23-cv-01419California571 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEAN-MAX DARBOUZE, Case No. 2:23-cv-1419 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ APPLICATION FOR AN v. EXTENSION OF TIME AND REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER SPENCER, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is the application of defendants J. Spencer, Ph.D. and Dr. R. Kim (“defendants”) for an extension of time to file a motion for summary judgment. As discussed below, defendants’ application is granted. I. BACKGROUND Due to difficulties in clarifying defendant Kim’s true name, service of process on defendant Kim was delayed. On March 5, 2025, defendant Kim’s motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order was granted, and the discovery and pretrial motions deadlines were continued to July 7, 2025, and September 29, 2025, respectively. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.