Adams
Scott R. Shipley v. Anise Adams, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT R. SHIPLEY, No. 2:24-cv-00032-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANISE ADAMS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Scott Shipley (“Plaintiff”) proceeds without counsel in this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 13, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007). The Court has…