Salmonson

Joel Elliott v. Salmonson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20252:24-cv-01651California322 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOEL ELLIOTT, No. 2:24-cv-01651-TLN-DMC Petitioner,

ORDER

v. SALMONSON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner Joel Elliott (“Petitioner”), a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On August 8, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. See ECF No. 20. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007). The Court has reviewed the file and finds 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.