Valame

Valame v. Trump

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 202524-369California709 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VIKRAM VALAME, No. 24-369 D.C. No. 5:23-cv- Plaintiff - Appellant, 03018-NC v.

DONALD J. TRUMP; CRAIG T. ORDER AND

BROWN; JOEL C. OPINION

SPANGENBERG; STEVEN L.

KETT; UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA, Selective Service System; ISMAIL RAMSEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Nathanael M. Cousins, Magistrate Judge, Presiding *

Submitted July 15, 2025**

Filed November 4, 2025

* The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: Barry G. Silverman, Richard C. Tallman, and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges.

Order; Per Curiam Opinion

SUMMARY ***

Military Selective Service Act

The panel affirmed the district court’s judgment dismissing for failure to state a claim an action brought by Vikram Valame challenging the constitutionality of the Military Selective Service Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.