Torres

Torres v. Unitedhealthcare Insurance Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 202524-4502California1,031 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 4 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL TORRES, No. 24-4502 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-01533-KK-SK and

MEMORANDUM*

EMSURGCARE, EMERGENCY

SURGICAL ASSISTANT,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

KARL STORZ ENDOSCOPY-AMERICA,

INC.,

Defendant.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Kenly Kiya Kato, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 20, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Daniel Torres (“Torres”) appeals the district court’s order

granting judgment to Defendant-Appellee UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company

(“United”) in a lawsuit Torres filed to challenge United’s denial of benefits. Torres

alleges two points of error on appeal. First, Torres argues that the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.