Lnu
Lnu v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 202524-4790California1,392 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 4 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MALKEET LNU; SUNITA RANI LNU; No. 24-4790 JAIVIN LOHAN, Agency Nos.
A241-692-761
Petitioners, A241-692-762
A241-692-763
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted October 20, 2025 San Francisco, California
Before: PAEZ, BEA, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners Malkeet, Sunita Rani, and Jaivin Lohan petition for review of a
decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal from
an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying asylum, withholding of removal,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 Malkeet is the
primary asylum applicant and was the primary respondent before the IJ and the