Lnu

Lnu v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 202524-4790California1,392 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 4 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MALKEET LNU; SUNITA RANI LNU; No. 24-4790 JAIVIN LOHAN, Agency Nos.

A241-692-761

Petitioners, A241-692-762

A241-692-763

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 20, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Malkeet, Sunita Rani, and Jaivin Lohan petition for review of a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal from

an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying asylum, withholding of removal,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 Malkeet is the

primary asylum applicant and was the primary respondent before the IJ and the

BIA; Sunita Rani and Jaivin Lohan…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.