Adams
Adams v. City of Seattle
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 202524-6505California655 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
NOV 4 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANITA ADAMS, No. 24-6505
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01767-TSZ
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CITY OF SEATTLE, Washington,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court* for the Western District of Washington Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 17, 2025 Seattle, Washington
Before: W. FLETCHER, GOULD, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
Anita Adams challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to
the City of Seattle (the “City”) in this action. Adams sought to build a four-
bedroom ancillary structure on her property to house her family and potential
renters. Before finalizing the construction plans, Adams learned that her property
is in a zone subject to Seattle’s Mandatory Housing Affordability for Residential
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Development (“MHA”) ordinance.