Dopak

Dopak v. Space Exploration Technologies Corporation CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 4, 2025B342000California2,494 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tamzarian, J.

Filed 11/4/25 Dopak v. Space Exploration Technologies Corporation CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(a). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115(a).

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

MICHELLE DOPAK, B342000

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County v. Super. Ct. No. 24STCV05506)

SPACE EXPLORATION

TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Tony L. Richardson, Judge. Affirmed. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, Melinda Riechert, Rachel Capler and Alexandria Elliott for Defendant and Appellant. Valles Law, Daniel G. Valles and Kayla Rathjen for Plaintiff and Respondent. In 2022, Congress amended the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) (9 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.