Kemp

Eric S. Kemp v. California Correctional Healthcare Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20253:24-cv-07281California549 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ERIC S KEMP, Case No. 24-cv-07281-TLT

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN

FORMA PAUPERIS; VACATING

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL JUDGMENT AND REOPENING CASE

HEALTHCARE SERVICES,

Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendant.

12 The Court previously dismissed plaintiff’s case and entered judgment on March 6, 2025 after plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within the time allowed. Dkt. Nos. 10, 11. Plaintiff subsequently wrote a letter to the Court stating that he had not been aware of any deadline to file his amended complaint, and attached his proposed amended complaint. Dkt. No. 13. The Court construed the letter as a request to reopen the case, and denied the request on September 16, 2025 because the proposed amended complaint did not state a cognizable claim. Dkt. No. 14. On October 30, 2025, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis and indicated that 20 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.