Juan Hernandez v. General Motors, LLC et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20252:25-cv-07066California2,861 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

On or around July 6, 2019, Plaintiff purchased a motor vehicle (the “Vehicle”). Compl. § 9, Dkt. No. 1-1. In connection with the purchase, Plaintiff received various warranties. Jd. 11. During Plaintiff's ownership of the Vehicle, the Vehicle manifested defects covered by the express warranties, including electrical systems and brake systems defects. Jd. □□□ Plaintiff delivered the Vehicle to Defendant and/or its authorized service and repair facilities for

Defendant filed a Notice of Errata and Corrected Opposition that is substantially the same as the Opposition. Dkt. No. 20. The Court has considered the Corrected Opposition. Jd.

Page 1 of CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk YS

diagnosis and repair of the defects, but Plaintiff alleges that Defendant failed to service or repair the Vehicle to conform to the applicable express warranties after a reasonable number of opportunities to do so. Id. ¶¶ 13–14.

Based on the above allegations, Plaintiff alleges violations of the Song- Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (“SBA”), California Civil Code §§ 1791.1, 1793.2, and 1794, and violations of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.