Crump

Steven Crump v. Joann Kingston, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20253:25-cv-06548California481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STEVEN CRUMP, Case No. 25-cv-06548-EMC (EMC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. ALTERNATIVE SERVICE

JOANN KINGSTON, et al., Docket No. 26, 27 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Steven Crump seeks leave to serve Defendants Joann Kingston and Gloria Rhynes by an alternative service method. Dkt. No. 26. Joann Kingston was an Alameda County Public Defender. Gloria Rhynes was an Alameda County Superior Court Judge. Judges are entitled to absolute immunity for acts within their judicial capacity, even if taken in error or in an excess of authority. See Meek v. County of Riverside, 183 F.3d 962, 965 (9th Cir. 1999). Plaintiff alleges that Judge Rhynes violated his rights by imposing an “unauthorized sentence” upon him. Dkt. No. 4 at 12. Given that imposing a sentence is a judicial act, Judge Rhynes cannot be held liable for it. As to Joann Kingston, it is settled law that “a public defender does not act under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.