Sharrod Moten v. Office of the Inspector General, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20251:25-cv-00188California656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 SHARROD MOTEN, Case No. 1:25-cv-00188-KES-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 12 v. Doc.

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR

GENERAL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Sharrod Moten is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 15, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Court’s orders. Doc. 20. On July 8, 2025, the Court declined to adopt the findings and recommendations and issued an order providing plaintiff a final opportunity to file an amended complaint within thirty days. More than thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), a court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.