Randall

Jeanine Randall, individually and as successor in interest to Sonia Huey v. Home Depot, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20252:23-cv-00476California5,973 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEANINE RANDALL, individually and as No. 2:23-cv-00476-DJC-CSK successor in interest to SONIA HUEY,

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. HOME DEPOT, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Defendant alleges that Plaintiff’s claims fail because they are time barred and/or fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Motion to Dismiss. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jeanine Randall filed suit against Defendant Home Depot U.S.A. following the death of her mother, Sonia Huey. Plaintiff is the heir and successor in interest of Huey. (Compl. (ECF No. 1-1, Ex. A) ¶ 19.) Defendant employed Huey at the Home Depot store in Auburn, California in 2020, during the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. (See id. ¶¶ 1, 2.) Huey worked in a small, windowless office…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.