Nangle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRYSTAL DE LA CRUZ, No. 2:24-cv-2001 DAD AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JONATHON NANGLE; JASON LYONS;

RYAN FRANZEN; SACRAMENTO

POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF SACRAMENTO; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants. 18 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se; pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff applied to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), and defendants were served with plaintiff’s operative Second Amended Complaint following the screening process associated with IFP status. ECF No. 7. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss this case as untimely. ECF No. 12. Plaintiff opposed the motion. ECF No. 16. Defendants did not reply. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends defendants’ motion to dismiss be GRANTED and that this case be closed. I. Background A. The…