McVay
Tim McVay v. Target; Target Corporation; and Does 1 to 100, inclusive
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIM MCVAY,
Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-00168-TLN-CSK
13 v. ORDER
TARGET; TARGET CORPORATION;
15 and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Tim McVay’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 10.) Defendant Target Corporation (“Defendant”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff did not file a reply. Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s Application for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 11.) Defendant filed an opposition. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff did not file a reply. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand and Application for Leave to File an Amended Complaint are DENIED. /// /// /// 27 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This is a premises liability case in which Plaintiff alleges he sustained injuries from a slip and fall incident (“the Subject Incident”) at Defendant’s store located in Elk Grove, California on January 19, 2022. …