Asya Weston, et al. v. WIP 800 J Lofts, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20252:25-cv-02364California5,081 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ASYA WESTON, et al., No. 2:25-cv-02364-DJC-CKD (PS) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER WIP 800 J LOFTS, et al.

Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs Asya Weston and Corinne Marshall initiated this action on August 19, 2025, with a pro se complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) On September 5, 2025, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No. 6.) Pursuant to the Court’s order (ECF No. 5), plaintiffs filed renewed motions to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 7, 8.) Because plaintiffs proceed pro se, this matter is referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiffs’ applications in support of the request to proceed in forma pauperis makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The motions to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 7, 8) are granted. I. Screening Requirement Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must screen every in forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.