Phillips

Phillips v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 5, 202524-6711California1,365 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL L. PHILLIPS II, No. 24-6711 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:24-cv-05191-BAT v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Brian Tsuchida, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 3, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: M. SMITH, NGUYEN, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Michael Phillips appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming

Commissioner of Social Security Frank Bisignano’s (“Commissioner”) denial of

disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under

28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.