Bondi

Chapa Martinez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 5, 202524-5899California703 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTOR ALFONSO CHAPA No. 24-5899 MARTINEZ; MARTHA NAYELY Agency Nos.

CALDERON MORALES; V.G.C.C., A244-045-953

A244-045-956

Petitioners,

A244-045-959

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 22, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: W. FLETCHER, CHRISTEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Victor Alfonso Chapa Martinez (Chapa Martinez), Martha Nayely Calderon

Morales (Calderon Morales), and V.G.C.C. (collectively, Petitioners), natives and

citizens of Mexico, seek review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (BIA) affirming the denial by an Immigration Judge (IJ) of:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.