Frazier

Frazier v. Greenberg CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 5, 2025D084791California2,928 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/5/25 Frazier v. Greenberg CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

PHILLIP FRAZIER, D084791

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2024-00010265-CU-NP-CTL) HOWARD GREENBERG et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Michael T. Smyth, Judge. Affirmed. Phillip Frazier, in pro. per, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Horton, Oberrecht & Kirkpatrick and Nathaniel J. Michels, for Defendants and Respondents. For nonlawyers to represent themselves in any legal proceeding is a challenge. Judges make every effort to ensure the right of every litigant to be heard (Cal. Code Jud. Ethics, canon 3(B)(8)), but at the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.