Litvinova
Tatyana Litvinova v. The City and County of San Francisco
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TATYANA LITVINOVA,
Case No. 18-cv-01494-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, Defendant.
This motion arises out of a collective action alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Following a deeply troubling course of conduct—which included defiance of court orders— sanctions were imposed against counsel for the Litvinova Plaintiffs under Rule 37. See Dkt. 180. Litvinova counsel1 now moves for reconsideration of that decision, arguing that new information has emerged which explains his dilatory representation. Dkt. 193. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7- 1(b), the motion is suitable for disposition without oral argument. Because Litvinova counsel has not adduced new facts which call into question the basis of the sanctions order, the motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND …