Isidro J. Armenta v. City of Los Angeles et al

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20252:22-cv-03753California562 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. 2:22-cv-03753-SPG-SHK JS- Date November 3, 2025 Title Isidro J. Armenta v. City of Los Angeles et al

ee Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Patricia Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF

PROSECUTION

On October 22, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff Isidro J. Armenta (‘Plaintiff’) to respond within ten calendar days as to why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. See (id.). On November 3, 2025, Plaintiff filed a response. See (ECF No. 81). There, Plaintiff blames Defendants for delays in bringing the case to resolution, citing Defendants’ “failures to supplement discovery, failures to participate in good-faith settlement negotiations, and insistence on presenting their prospective defense(s) as if they were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.