Isidro J. Armenta v. City of Los Angeles et al
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL
Case No. 2:22-cv-03753-SPG-SHK JS- Date November 3, 2025 Title Isidro J. Armenta v. City of Los Angeles et al
ee Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Patricia Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present
Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF
PROSECUTION
On October 22, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff Isidro J. Armenta (‘Plaintiff’) to respond within ten calendar days as to why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. See (id.). On November 3, 2025, Plaintiff filed a response. See (ECF No. 81). There, Plaintiff blames Defendants for delays in bringing the case to resolution, citing Defendants’ “failures to supplement discovery, failures to participate in good-faith settlement negotiations, and insistence on presenting their prospective defense(s) as if they were…