Lowayne Golik v. General Motors LLC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20252:25-cv-06921California1,409 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:25-cv-06921-HDV-E LOWAYNE GOLIK,

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND AND FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES [15]

GENERAL MOTORS LLC, et al. Defendants. 17

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I. INTRODUCTION This lemon law action arises out of Plaintiff Lowayne Golik’s purchase of a 2017 Cadillac CTS-V from Dublin Chevrolet. Plaintiff alleges that his vehicle experienced “sunroof and infotainment defects” during the warranty period. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (“Motion”) [Dkt. 15], which asserts that the removal of this case on July 29, 2025 was untimely. Plaintiff maintains that removability was clear from the face of the Complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court [Dkt. 1-1], or, in the alternative, as early as June 23, 2025, when Plaintiff made initial disclosures including the sales contract and repair records. For the reasons discussed thoroughly in Chavarin v. General Motors LLC,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.