Leech

Leech v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 6, 202524-5218California2,014 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 6 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MATTHEW M. LEECH, No. 24-5218 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-05639-GJL v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Grady J. Leupold, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 4, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: M. SMITH, NGUYEN, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Matthew M. Leech appeals the district court’s decision affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for disability insurance

benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1. We held in Cody v. Kijakazi that a claimant succeeding on an

Appointments Clause…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.