Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. Google Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 6, 202524-4837California1,487 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 6 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE ESTATE No. 24-4837 OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ D.C. No. GONZALEZ, individually and as the 4:16-cv-03282-DMR Representative of the Estate of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE HERNANDEZ;

REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Donna M. Ryu, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 22, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: CLIFTON, OWENS, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion to file a

proposed fourth amended complaint (“FAC”) for want of subject matter

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. jurisdiction. The district court concluded that the FAC failed to allege sufficient

grounds for either…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.