Daughtery

Daughtery v. Powell CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 6, 2025E083686California5,242 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/6/25 Daughtery v. Powell CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

CARL DAUGHTERY,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E083686

v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVMB2400001)

MELODY GLORENE POWELL, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. John W. Burdick,

Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.

Melody Powell, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant and appellant Melody Powell appeals the grant of a civil harassment

restraining order issued pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 527.61 requiring she

1 All…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.