Royston
Royston v. City of Scottsdale
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 6, 202524-6530California817 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 6 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NICHOL ROYSTON,
No. 24-6530 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00542-SMB v.
MEMORANDUM*
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a municipal corporation,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JEFFREY WALTHER, individually and in their official capacities, RICHARD
SLAVIN, MATTHEW EVANS,
CHRISTOPHER DIPIAZZA, JILL
BOEHM, DON TELLIS, DONNA
BROWN, ALEXANDER RISTUCCIA,
UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 1- 20,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 23, 2025 Phoenix, Arizona
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: GRABER, TALLMAN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff Nichol Royston timely appeals the district court’s entry of summary
judgment in favor of Defendant City of Scottsdale on her claims under the
Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), Family and Medical Leave Act
(“FMLA”), and Families…