Royston

Royston v. City of Scottsdale

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 6, 202524-6530California817 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 6 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NICHOL ROYSTON,

No. 24-6530 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00542-SMB v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a municipal corporation,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

JEFFREY WALTHER, individually and in their official capacities, RICHARD

SLAVIN, MATTHEW EVANS,

CHRISTOPHER DIPIAZZA, JILL

BOEHM, DON TELLIS, DONNA

BROWN, ALEXANDER RISTUCCIA,

UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 1- 20,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 23, 2025 Phoenix, Arizona

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: GRABER, TALLMAN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Nichol Royston timely appeals the district court’s entry of summary

judgment in favor of Defendant City of Scottsdale on her claims under the

Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), Family and Medical Leave Act

(“FMLA”), and Families…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.