Pattison

Mary Pattison v. HP Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20253:24-cv-02752California1,833 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 MARY PATTISON, Case No. 24-cv-02752-MMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

HP INC., PLEADINGS Defendant.

11 Before the Court is defendant HP Inc.'s ("HP") Motion, filed August 29, 2025, "for Judgment on the Pleadings." Plaintiff Mary Pattison ("Pattison") has filed opposition, to which HP has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that, "[a]fter the pleadings are closed―but early enough not to delay trial―a party may move for judgment on the pleadings." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c). "Judgment on the pleadings is proper when the moving party clearly establishes on the face of the pleadings that no material issue of fact remains to be resolved and that it is entitled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.