Brown

MARIO B BROWN v. AUTO WAREHOUSING CO.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20253:24-cv-07300California2,276 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO B BROWN, Case No. 24-cv-07300-RFL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. REMAND AND MOTION TO DISMISS

AUTO WAREHOUSING CO., Re: Dkt. Nos. 21, 24 Defendant.

Plaintiff Mario Brown brought a class action suit in California state court against his employer, Defendant Auto Warehousing Co., and 100 Doe Defendants. Brown’s complaint alleged five causes of action comprising violations of the California Labor Code for (1) failure to pay minimum wage for all hours of work, (2) failure to authorize or permit meal periods, (3) failure to indemnify employees for employment-related losses and expenditures, (4) failure to provide complete and accurate wage statements, and (5) unfair business practices in violation of the Business and Professions Code. (Dkt. No. 1-2 (“Complaint”).) Auto Warehousing removed the case to federal court, asserting that removal was proper based on either (a) federal question jurisdiction under the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”) or (b) diversity jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”). (Dkt. No. 1.) Auto…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.