Wilson

Jasaray Wilson v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20253:25-cv-00043California2,588 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JASARAY WILSON, Case No. 25-cv-00043-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

TARGET CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Jasaray Wilson alleges that Defendant Target Corporation (“Target”), her former employer, discriminated against her, harassed her, and retaliated against her based on her gender and sex, and she contends Target wrongfully terminated her employment. Before the Court is Target’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for November 20, 2025, is VACATED. See Civil L.R. 7-6, Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 78(b). Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Target’s motion for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND On November 20, 2024, Wilson filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.