Kellman

Dr. Sanford Alan Kellman v. The Home Depot, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20254:25-cv-06974California617 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DR. SANFORD ALAN KELLMAN, Case No. 25-cv-06974-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND

THE HOME DEPOT, LLC, Re: ECF No. 7 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Sanford Alan Kellman’s motion to remand based on his contention that Defendant Home Depot’s1 removal was untimely. ECF No. 7. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civil L.R. 7-1(b), and will deny the motion. A defendant must file a notice of removal “within 30 days after the receipt by the defendant, through service or otherwise,” of the complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(1). The parties agree that the last day of this 30-day period fell on Saturday, August 16, 2025, and that Home Depot did not file its notice of removal until Monday, August 18, 2025. The removal statute does not “specify a method of computing time,” so Rule 6(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.