Firsov

Sergey Firsov, et al. v. Qatar Airways Group (Q,C.S.C.)

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20255:25-cv-05325California1,107 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SERGEY FIRSOV, et al., Case No. 5:25-cv-05325-BLF Plaintiffs, v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

QATAR AIRWAYS GROUP (Q,C.S.C.), RECONSIDERATION AND MOTION Defendant. FOR DEFAULT 10 [Re: ECF Nos. 34, 41, 43]

12 Pro se Plaintiff Sergey Firsov has filed two motions, one entitled “Request for Entry of Default Under FRCP 55(a),” ECF No. 41, and one entitled “Motion for Default Judgment by Court Pursuant to FRCP 55(b),” ECF No. 43 (collectively, “Rule 55 Mot.”). For the reasons described below, the Court construes both motions as a single motion seeking review of the Clerk of Court’s denial of his request for entry of default. Defendant Qatar Airways Group (Q, C.S.C.) (“Qatar Air”) has filed a single brief in opposition to both of those motions. ECF No. 49 (“Opp.”). Mr. Firsov previously filed a motion for reconsideration. ECF No. 34 (“Recon. Mot.”). For the reasons described below, the Reconsideration Motion is DENIED AS MOOT, and 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.