Abram Soto et al. v. General Motors LLC et al.

I. BACKGROUND

According to Plaintiffs’ complaint (“Complaint” or “Compl.”), on or around May 9, 2021, Plaintiffs purchased a motor vehicle (the “Vehicle”). Compl., Dkt. No. 1-1, 49. In connection with the purchase, Plaintiffs received various warranties. Jd. 11. During Plaintiffs’ ownership of the Vehicle, the Vehicle manifested defects covered by the express warranties, including HVAC system, infotainment, steering, and engine defects. Jd. § 12. Plaintiffs delivered the

Page 1 of CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk YS

Vehicle to Defendant and/or its authorized service and repair facilities for diagnosis and repair of the defects, but Plaintiffs allege that the Vehicle was not serviced or repaired to conform to the applicable express warranties after a reasonable number of opportunities to do so. Id. ¶¶ 13-14.

Based on the above allegations, Plaintiffs allege violations of the Song- Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (“SBA”). California Civil Code §§ 1791.1, 1793.2, and 1794. Id. ¶¶ 8-33. Plaintiffs commenced this action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on May 20, 2025. See generally id. Plaintiffs served Defendant…