Tremaine Carroll v. State of California, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20251:23-cv-00974California690 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TREMAINE CARROLL, Case No. 1:23-cv-00974-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING ATTORNEY ALAIN

BROWNING TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ORDER Defendant. SEVEN DAY DEADLINE 16 On February 14, 2025, Plaintiff’s former counsel, Attorney Joseph Virgilio of the Justice Law Firm, moved to withdraw from this action. (Doc. No. 32, “Virgilio’s Motion”). While Virgilio’s Motion remained pending, Attorney Alain Browning, also of the Justice Law Firm, entered a notice of appearance on behalf of Plaintiff. (Doc. No. 37). On July 2, 2025, the previously assigned magistrate judge granted Virgilio’s Motion. (Doc. No. 41). This matter was subsequently reassigned to the undersigned magistrate judge. (Doc. No. 42). On July 31, 2025, after noting that it was unclear whether Attorney Browning continued to represent Plaintiff in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.