Zamora-Morado

Zamora-Morado v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 202522-702California783 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELISEO ZAMORA-MORADO, No. 22-702 Agency No. Petitioner, A206-236-937 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 5, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: M. SMITH, NGUYEN, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Eliseo Zamora-Morado, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal

of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for cancellation of

removal and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252. We deny the petition.

“When the BIA reviews the IJ’s decision de novo, ‘our…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.