Morales-Ocampo

Morales-Ocampo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 202524-3081California643 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESTEBAN MORALES-OCAMPO; No. 24-3081 GUADALUPE HERNANDEZ-FLORES; Agency Nos.

B.M.H.; M.M.H., A246-596-714

A246-596-715

Petitioners,

A246-596-716

A246-596-717

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 5, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: M. SMITH, NGUYEN, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Esteban Morales-Ocampo, Guadalupe Hernandez-Flores, and their two

children B.M.H. and M.M.H. are natives and citizens of Mexico. They petition for

review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.