Ma
Ma v. Bisignano
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TRICIA MA, No. 24-7435 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-02278-KML v. FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of MEMORANDUM* Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Krissa M. Lanham, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 23, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: GRABER, TALLMAN, and BADE, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge BADE. Claimant Tricia Ma timely appeals the district court’s decision affirming the
Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) determination that she was not disabled
because she was able to perform other work that “exists in significant numbers in
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the national economy.” 20 C.F.R. § 416.960(c)(2. We review de…