Ma

Ma v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 202524-7435California1,943 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TRICIA MA, No. 24-7435 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-02278-KML v. FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of MEMORANDUM* Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Krissa M. Lanham, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 23, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: GRABER, TALLMAN, and BADE, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge BADE. Claimant Tricia Ma timely appeals the district court’s decision affirming the

Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) determination that she was not disabled

because she was able to perform other work that “exists in significant numbers in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the national economy.” 20 C.F.R. § 416.960(c)(2. We review de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.