Bondi

Chapa Martinez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 202524-5434California885 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA FERNANDA CHAPA No. 24-5434 MARTINEZ; CARLOS ARMANDO Agency Nos.

CALDERON MORALES; I.A.C.C.; A244-045-965

C.Z.C.C., A244-045-964

A244-045-966

Petitioners,

A244-045-968

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 5, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: M. SMITH, NGUYEN, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Maria Fernanda Chapa Martinez, her spouse Carlos Armando

Calderon Morales, and her two minor children petition for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.