In re E.H. CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 7, 2025A173260California9,561 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fujisaki, J.

Filed 11/7/25 In re E.H. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re E.H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

SAN FRANCISCO HUMAN

SERVICES AGENCY,

Plaintiff and Respondent, A173260 v. (San Francisco County J.J. et al., Super. Ct. No. JD23-3196) Defendants and Appellants.

J.J. (Father) and N.H. (Mother), parents of minor E.H., each appeal from an order of the juvenile court terminating their parental rights, claiming the court erred in concluding the parents failed to establish the beneficial relationship exception, and in determining the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA; 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) and related California law did not apply. Mother additionally contends the court erred in denying her petition to modify the order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.