Jalalian
Armen Jalalian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARMEN JALALIAN, Case No. 3:25-cv-01411-LJC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
AND ENHANCED SANCTIONS;
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF
HEARING; AND MOTION FOR
Defendant. SANCTIONS OR TO DISQUALIFY
COUNSEL
12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 69, 71, 75
15 Before the Court are Plaintiff Armen Jalalian’s Motion for Judicial Notice of Defendant’s 16 Recidivist Status and for Enhanced Sanctions (ECF No. 69), Motion for Continuance of Hearing 17 (ECF No. 71), and Motion for Sanctions and to Disqualify Counsel (ECF No. 75). The Court 18 assumes the parties’ familiarity with this case’s factual and procedural history. Pursuant to Civil 19 Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that these motions may be resolved without oral argument 20 and DENIES all three. The Court’s reasoning is as follows. 21 A. Motions for Sanctions Plaintiff filed a motion for judicial notice and sanctions following Defendant’s…