P.

E.P., et al. v. COUNTY OF KERN, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20251:25-cv-01260California1,171 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Background 20 Plaintiff Alejandro Perez Ramos, Sr., as the natural parent and purported successor in interest of 21 decedent minor Alejandro Andres Perez, Jr. (“A.P.”), and minor E.P., by and through her purported 22 guardian ad litems Rolando Rivera and Amalia Ramos, initiated this action with the filing of a complaint 23 on September 23, 2025. (Doc. 1). Plaintiffs assert causes of action to recover damages pursuant to 42 24 U.S.C. § 1983 for Defendants’ actions and/or failures resulting in the wrongful death of A.P. while in 25 the care, custody, and control and under the supervision of the named Defendants, and injuries sustained 26 to E.P. See id. at 21-22. 27 /// 28 Order Directing Plaintiffs to File Motions for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem The complaint alleges that A.P. is the deceased minor child of Plaintiff Perez Ramos, Sr. Id. ¶ 5. The complaint further alleges that Plaintiff Perez Ramos, Sr., as the natural father of A.P. whose parental rights were never terminated, has standing to bring this action. Id. The complaint does not address whether there is any known guardian or conservator on behalf of A.P. to initiate a claim or 6 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.