Jacqueline Valentine v. San Mateo County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20253:25-cv-05607California1,745 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JACQUELINE VALENTINE, Case No. 25-cv-05607-LJC

Plaintiff,

FURTHER ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 9 SAN MATEO COUNTY, Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Jacqueline Valentine, proceeding pro se, sued San Mateo County, San Mateo County ADA Coordinator Daniel Radovich, and San Mateo Superior Court Judge Sarah Burdick in the Central District of California. ECF No. 1 (Compl.). The case was transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to the undersigned magistrate judge, who granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B). ECF No. 8. The Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why her case should not be dismissed for failing to allege the basis for the Court’s jurisdiction over the matter and instructed Plaintiff to file an amended Complaint. Id. Plaintiff has now done so. ECF No. 9 (First Am. Compl.) (FAC). A district court must dismiss a case filed without the payment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.