Bryan Mitchell v. H. Gomez, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20252:25-cv-05847California347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-05847-SVW-DTB Date: November 7, 2025 Title: Bryan Mitchell v. H. Gomez, et al.

Present: The Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. District Judge

Daniel Tamayo Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO

PAY FILING FEE OR FILE A COMPLETE

IN FORMA PAUPERIS REQUEST

All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States must pay a filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party’s failure to pay the filing fee only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). However, prisoners must still pay the filing fee but may do so through monthly installment payments if granted IFP. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b); Johnson v. High Desert State Prison, 127 F.4th 123, 126, 128 (9th Cir. 2025). On September 10, 2025, the Court postponed ruling on Plaintiff’s IFP request (“Request”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.