Dauda Iliya v. County of Sacramento, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20252:22-cv-01305California1,001 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAUDA ILIYA, No. 2:22-cv-01305-DC-CSK (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

RECONSIDERATION

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., (ECF Nos. 49, 68, 71, 72, 76) Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 18, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 68) recommending that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 49) be granted. Those findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On March 10, 2025, Plaintiff filed untimely objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 70), including objecting that the claims against Defendant Scott R. 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.