Shannon O. Murphy v. Keller/Postman LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20254:25-cv-08145California1,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division SHANNON O. MURPHY, Case No. 25-cv-08145-LB

Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. Re: ECF No.

KELLER/POSTMAN LLC, Defendant. 16 INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT The plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se and seeks to proceed in forma pauperis, sued defendant Keller Postman LLC, claiming damages of $350,000, alleging that he tried to consult with a Keller Postman attorney, possibly about his treatment at a VA facility or injuries at Camp Lejeune. In response, they sent emails (including requests related to HIPPA information) and did not accommodate his request for a consultation, in violation of state law (including negligence, breach of contract, discrimination and harassment by unfair emails implicating HIPPA, and assault).1 The complaint was filed in the Eastern District of California, which transferred the case to the Northern District of California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.