Muhammad
Danial Muhammad v. Kaiser Permanente Group, Inc., et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIAL MUHAMMAD, Case No. 25-cv-08265-LJC
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO
v. WHY APPLICATION TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT
KAISER PERMANENTE GROUP, INC., et BE DENIED al., Re: Dkt. No. 2 Defendants.
13 Plaintiff Danial Muhammad, pro se, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) using the Northern District’s form application. The primary effects of such an application being granted would be to excuse Plaintiff from paying the $405 filing fee for this civil action and that an agent of the Court (typically the U.S. Marshal) would complete service of process on their behalf, if the Court determines that Plaintiff’s Complaint is not subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C § 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff’s IFP application states that he is “unable to pay the costs of this action or give security, and that” he believes he is entitled to relief from being required to prepay the…