Julius M. Engel v. Paragon Systems, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20252:24-cv-02479California1,288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIUS M. ENGEL, No. 2:24-cv-02479-DJC-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff proceeds in this action in pro per. This matter is before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c)(21). On April 21, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 45), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On May 2, 2025, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 49.) On May 05, 2025, Defendants Federal Protective Service (“FPS”); Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”); and Social Security Administration (“SSA”); Richard Castrellon; Robert Marquez; and Sheila Sharma’s (“Federal Defendants”) filed a Response to Plaintiff’s Objections (ECF No. 50), and on May 12,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.